This is the mail archive of the
ecos-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1001078] STM32 flash driver support for non-aligned sourcebuffers.
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: unassigned at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:50:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug 1001078] STM32 flash driver support for non-aligned sourcebuffers.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1001078-777@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001078
Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC| |jifl@ecoscentric.com
AssignedTo|unassigned@bugs.ecos.source |jifl@ecoscentric.com
|ware.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Flag| |Patch_or_Contribution+
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com> 2010-11-21 21:50:05 GMT ---
I'm not keen on this patch I'm afraid. The other drivers (e.g. AM29xxxxxv2,
stratav2) have the same constraints and intentionally enforce alignment. I
don't want to go down the route of people expecting unaligned data to be ok
(and then they'd be likely to claim it is a "bug" for unaligned data not to be
accepted by any driver).
That said, I wouldn't have a problem with this being a driver-specific CDL
option if you wanted to rework it on those lines, if you're keen.
The length alignment check is reasonable in any case of course.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.