This is the mail archive of the ecos-bugs@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263


Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819

--- Comment #16 from Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> 2011-03-16 17:19:53 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
>
> > > No ARM7 has cache, so it's safe IMO.
> > 
> > Samsung S3C45xx ARM7 parts have cache.  Or did you mean no Atmel
> > ARM7 parts have cache?
> 
> Ah ok, that changes things then. This is meant to be a generic ARM7
> HAL. The initial focus is on AT91, but it's definitely not meant to
> be an AT91 ARM7 HAL.
> 
> In that case that complicates things. We need to construct the ARM7
> variant hal_cache.h in such a way that a processor HAL
> (e.g. S3C45xx) can override all the settings.

FWIW, the "snds" port is for the Samsung S3C4500/4510 ARM7 parts and
supports the CACHE macros.  I haven't looked at it in ages, so I don't
know what state it's in.  Those parts are so old that I doubt anybody
cares enough to re-write the HAL to use any sort of generic ARM7
support. (They are still selling the '4510, but the '4500 died ages
ago.)

-- 
Grant

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]