This is the mail archive of the
ecos-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1001186] Introduce Cortex-M4 to the Cortex-M architecture
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: unassigned at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:42:32 +0100
- Subject: [Bug 1001186] Introduce Cortex-M4 to the Cortex-M architecture
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1001186-777@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001186
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Gavrikov <sergei.gavrikov@gmail.com> 2011-04-06 16:42:30 BST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The M4 stuff looks OK to me.
>
> However, I am not sure that we need the M0 option.
[snip]
> Adding M0 to the list would raise entirely false expectations that this
> processor type was supported. In fact, I would prefer to remove M1, since
> these parts have the same problems.
>
> We would have to do quite a lot of work to support M0/1. Given that these
> parts are targeted at very low resource systems, I doubt that there will
> ever be much demand for eCos on these.
Nick, thank you for your expert look and explanation. So then, should I
reject the M0 (and M1?) mentions from the cortexm config file?
Ilija, do you have M0-claim for your present ports? If you have not,
I'll fix the patch too.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.