This is the mail archive of the
ecos-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: ecos-bugs at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:31:41 +0100
- Subject: [Bug 1000819] Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1000819-13@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819
--- Comment #32 from Ilija Kocho <ilijak@siva.com.mk> 2011-05-19 14:31:37 BST ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> (In reply to comment #30)
>
> > However if larger re-organization of AT91 port is considered, I
> > would propose moving AT91 peripherals out of ARM devs subdirectories
> > (except for peripherals based on ARM IP, if any). Something like
> > this:
> >
> > packages-+
> > +-devs+
> > +-serial+
> > +-AT91-+
> > +-current-+...
>
> That's what makes the most sense to me, and it's the way all the other
> processor families are supported -- isn't it?
I couldn't tell. In general devs looks pretty much scattered to me. For example
there are many directories related to Freescale's controllers, I can imagine
some of them contain same devices. On the other hand are ARM directories that
contain devices that are not related to ARM (architecture or company) merely to
chips with ARM cores.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.