This is the mail archive of the
ecos-bugs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
[Bug 1001468] eCos GNU tools 4.6.2
- From: bugzilla-daemon at bugs dot ecos dot sourceware dot org
- To: ecos-bugs at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 16:20:09 +0000
- Subject: [Bug 1001468] eCos GNU tools 4.6.2
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-1001468-13@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
Please do not reply to this email. Use the web interface provided at:
http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001468
Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jifl@ecoscentric.com
--- Comment #32 from Jonathan Larmour <jifl@ecoscentric.com> 2012-03-13 16:20:04 GMT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
>
> I am quite busy this week but might find some time to build a new test release
> based on GCC 4.6.3. I'm not sure if we should apply Jifl's GDB patch for the
> 'g' packet reply issue or continue with the current "set tdesc" workaround
> until the merge of his patch with other changes has occurred and we can apply
> something which reflects the upstream changes. Comments?
There's still a bit of discussion (due to uncertainty on my part in fact), but
you can be pretty confident something similar to the following (post-merge)
patch will be applied:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-03/msg00377.html
Or you can leave it out if you don't intend these tools to be the final tools.
But IMO we shouldn't ship a GDB without something akin to this fix being
included.
Jifl
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.