This is the mail archive of the
ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: problem with gcc3.2 compiler
Gary Thomas wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 06:07, Jani Monoses wrote:
That's really too bad - we can't take it out globally because that
could possibly break things for folks using older compilers and we
may have troubles using newer ones..
The proverbial rock and hard place :-(
Would a cdl option for the compiler version used be too ugly?
We don't have very good handling of options like this. Also, sadly,
the compiler options are somewhat spread around rather than being
localized (e.g. in the architecture HAL only). Currently there
are 96! occurrences of -finit-priority, so making any change in this
area will be non-trivial.
We recently made some changes in the makefile rule template. Perhaps
we could just make a similar one for this case.
As Bart was only just recently saying, the only real alternative is to
have a step that at the beginning of the build runs $(COMMAND_PREFIX)gcc
--version and parses the output, and adjusts the makefile options
accordingly. Icky.
Something along these lines:
I just tested this mini-makefile which works fine:
COMMAND_PREFIX=/opt/ecos/gnutools/arm-elf/bin/arm-elf-
COMPILERVER := $(shell $(COMMAND_PREFIX)gcc --version | head -1 | cut -f3
-d " ")
COMPILERMAJOR := $(shell echo $(COMPILERVER) | cut -f1 -d .)
COMPILERMINOR := $(shell echo $(COMPILERVER) | cut -f2 -d .)
COMPILERPATCHLEVEL := $(shell echo $(COMPILERVER) | cut -f3 -d .)
all:
echo $(COMPILERMAJOR) $(COMPILERMINOR) $(COMPILERPATCHLEVEL)
If y'all (Hi Bart) is happy that this is the way to do it, I'll put the
appropriate stuff in pkgconf/rules.mak
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine