This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: NAND review
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at jifvik dot org>
- To: Simon Kallweit <simon dot kallweit at intefo dot ch>
- Cc: "ecos-devel at ecos dot sourceware dot org" <ecos-devel at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:09:21 +0100
- Subject: Re: NAND review
- References: <4A126D59.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Simon Kallweit wrote:
Well these are my first thoughts on the prereleased code. I hope more
people take a look at it and we can have a discussion and soon decide
which NAND framework we're going to use.
Just to clarify something here, I don't think it's a case of this one or
that one. Provided someone is prepared to put in the effort, it is
possible to have a mix of both, with the best aspects of both. It seems
unlikely to me that one of them will be superior to the other in every way.
Like you, I'm also concerned about some aspects of Ross's use of
partitioning (and have emailed some details privately to him about that).
But I'm also concerned about possibly having too much layering in Rutger's
version for small simple implementations. I guess we'll wait for Ross to
reply with more detail on his rationale for the differences to Rutger's.
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine