This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: NAND technical review
- From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at jifvik dot org>
- To: Simon Kallweit <simon dot kallweit at intefo dot ch>
- Cc: Ross Younger <wry at eCosCentric dot com>, eCos developers <ecos-devel at ecos dot sourceware dot org>, Rutger Hofman <rutger at cs dot vu dot nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:53:13 +0100
- Subject: Re: NAND technical review
- References: <4AC6218C.email@example.com> <4AD820DE.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Simon Kallweit wrote:
I still try to give a quick flashback of my work with both R's and E's
Thanks very much. Your insight is valuable, especially given your experience.
I will gladly elaborate in more detail if there are further questions
about my experience with both frameworks.
You wouldn't happen to have any opinion on run-time overheads of E's
versus R's? Just since we were discussing this in the thread (I asked the
same of Jurgen) and it wasn't clear whether these add up to anything
significant compared to the NAND accesses themselves.
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine