This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RedBoot RAM version problem


Hi,

I start to examine this file !! i make a little changment in the code for see th
differents ID , build it and execute it !!!

so  MANUFACTURER ID that device return is 18 and the expected by redboot is 31
      FLASH device ID that device return is 0 and the expected by redboot is 164

So What should i do ? bypass this test or not ?

Jesper Skov wrote:

> >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Sebastien <sebastien.andre@sxb.bsf.alcatel.fr> writes:
>
> Andre> Yes it s this flash device that i have (AT29C040A) !!!!  What
> Andre> does it wrong ?
>
> Dunno. I remember we had a similar problem with one of the boards in
> our test farm, but I never got around to investigate.
>
> The problem is that the device ID returned by the device when queried
> is not what the driver expects. See flash_hwr_init in
> devs/flash/atmel/at29cxxxx/current/include/flash_at29cxxxx.inl.
>
> Jesper


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]