This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: RedBoot FLASH config suggestion
- To: "'Gary Thomas'" <gthomas at redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] RedBoot FLASH config suggestion
- From: "Trenton D. Adams" <tadams at theone dot dnsalias dot com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 17:54:34 -0600
- Cc: "'Jonathan Larmour'" <jlarmour at redhat dot com>, "'eCos Discussion'" <ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
Vintages? I created both of them today using the eCosRepository that I
downloaded Monday or Tuesday if that's what you mean!
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Thomas [mailto:gthomas@redhat.com]
Sent: September 20, 2001 4:20 PM
To: Trenton D. Adams
Cc: 'Jonathan Larmour'; 'eCos Discussion'
Subject: RE: [ECOS] RedBoot FLASH config suggestion
The most probable case is that I've fixed bugs in the 'fconfig' layout
recently and that your ROM vs RAM versions are of different vintages.
On Fri, 2001-09-21 at 04:04, Trenton D. Adams wrote:
> Nope, not possible. I have the ECOS_REPOSITORY variable set.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jlarmour@cambridge.redhat.com
> [mailto:jlarmour@cambridge.redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Larmour
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: Trenton D. Adams
> Cc: 'eCos Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RedBoot FLASH config suggestion
>
>
> "Trenton D. Adams" wrote:
> >
> > I get the error below every time I switch from a RAM version to a
> > ROM version or vice versa. This only happens when "fconfig" has
> > been run
> on
> > the other version (RAM|ROM). So, I assume that the checksum is
> > based
> on
> > whether a RAM/ROM version is running? If so, what's the purpose of
> > this? How do you get it so that the RAM version will use the same
> > config as the ROM version?
> >
> > FLASH configuration checksum error or invalid key
>
> Different source base used to build the two?
>
> Jifl