RE: [ECOS] Is it the right forum?

["Dan Conti" <danc at iobjects dot com>]

Were the mutex optimization patch to be applied, i'd be more than happy
to provide ARM hal support.

Is the issue that Luoqi is uninterested in doing the copyright
assignment, or just one of those never got around to it things?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jlarmour@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 11:04 AM
> To: Nick Garnett
> Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Is it the right forum?
> 
> 
> Nick Garnett wrote:
> > 
> > Another approach is to use lock-free synchronization mechanisms to
> > update kernel data structures. Again this would require major
> > restructuring, and not all architectures have support for the
> > compare-and-swap operations that this would need.
> 
> Which reminds me, have you seen these patches?
> http://www.freebsd.org/~luoqi/ecos
> 
> Now if only Luoqi had a copyright assignment.... (hint, hint :-)).
> 
> Jifl
> -- 
> Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 
> (1223) 271062
> Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || 
> Opinions==mine
>