This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++ ecos performance

Grant Edwards wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 09:29:01AM -0600, Rosimildo da Silva wrote:
> > I dare to ask: what is "unsafe" in C++ that is not in C ?
> 
> Nothing.  C is also unsafe.  But, C is far simpler, so it's
> easier to avoid the pitfalls.

Using this line of reasoning, it would be far safer to have
only a hammer in ones toolbox (perhaps only a rubber hammer).

Perhaps we could even get some government regulations to
protect us from our selves.

Oops ... I did it again,
mike

-- 
Michael N. Moran
5009 Old Field Ct.
Kennesaw, GA 30144
(h) 770 516 7918
(c) 678 521 5460

The Beatles were wrong: 1 & 1 & 1 is 1

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]