This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c++ ecos performance

From: Robin Farine <robin dot farine at acn-group dot ch>
To: mnmoran at bellsouth dot net
Cc: eCos Discussion <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 11 Mar 2002 13:57:03 +0100
Subject: Re: [ECOS] c++ ecos performance
References: <20020307225402.11887.qmail@web21303.mail.yahoo.com><1015553921.32621.278.camel@hermes><20020307205129.A9074@grante.dsl.visi.com><3C8914F3.8AA34A21@bellsouth.net> <20020308141756.A6699@visi.com><OE62vk0Q0ogHGmiWIny00008e0b@hotmail.com><20020310203508.A2628@grante.dsl.visi.com> <3C8CA403.6F49F18@bellsouth.net>

On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 13:33, Mike Moran wrote:
> 
> Perhaps we could even get some government regulations to
> protect us from our selves.
> 
> Oops ... I did it again,

I can't resist any longer ;-)

The safest way, in my opinion, is to program in binary (not hex, ok?)
since there are only two signs (very simple) and for each key pressed,
there is a good chance of having chosen the right one.

Stupid, I know.

Robin

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- c++ ecos performance
  - From: max rtos
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Gary Thomas
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Mike Moran
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Rosimildo da Silva
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: c++ ecos performance
  - From: Mike Moran

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]