This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: accurate ms delay
- From: Jani Monoses <jani at iv dot ro>
- To: <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:36:39 +0300 (EEST)
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] accurate ms delay
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Jesper Skov wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 12:26, Jani Monoses wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it OK to use hal_delay_us in a generic .inl driver instead of the
> > > not-too-accurate for loops?
> >
> > Yes, it's always a preference over for loops. Just be carefull to not
> > delay with the interrupts disabled.
>
> And obviously it can be no more accurate than the resolution of the clock
> device feeding it.
I was thinking about waiting for erase completion in flash drivers.I hope
interrupts are enabled at that time.
Jani
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss