This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Performance problem mpc8xx
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew dot lunn at ascom dot ch>
- To: Daniel dot Andersson at combitechsystems dot com
- Cc: alvalgal at disca dot upv dot es, ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:16:03 +0200
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Performance problem mpc8xx
- References: <2253171AF143D21185A60000F8FA748B04840BCD@pluto.combitech.se>
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 01:03:18PM +0200, Daniel.Andersson@combitechsystems.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the newest cvs (with last-rhepl flag) but i cant find the
> change that you refer to. Maybe you have it?
This tag is not eCos 2.0. That tag is for the last version of eCos
with the RedHat eCos Public Licence (RHEPL). Get the head of the cvs
tree. Thats eCos 2.0 and it uses a modified GPL licence.
Andrew
>
> Regards, Daniel
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Alfredo [mailto:alvalgal@disca.upv.es]
> >Sent: den 20 maj 2002 09:03
> >To: eCos Discuss
> >Subject: Re: [ECOS] Performance problem mpc8xx
> >
> >
> >
> >> Something else: we had an internal bug on bad dhrystone
> >performance on
> >> the 850. It's closed now, and turned out to be due to the caches not
> >> being set up correctly. I don't know exactly what the fix
> >was. But you
> >> can look for it in eCos V2...
> >>
> >> Jesper
> >
> >Hi.
> >
> > When is going to be available this release of eCos (ecos v2.0)?
> >
> >Regards.
> >
> >Alfredo.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> >and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
> >
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss