This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Performance measurement


On Wednesday 05 June 2002 15.58, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 07:53, Christer Kaivo-oja wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 June 2002 15.06, Gary Thomas wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 07:04, Christer Kaivo-oja wrote:
> > > > Well, all the other tests run just fine... Where can I find info on
> > > > how to decode the sigtrap?
> > >
> > > What's the platform?
> > >
> > > Can you send the exact output from GDB (I'm assuming that you run it
> > > from GDB)?
> >
> > I'm running a SA1110 board (Trizeps by Keith & Koep) and have based my
> > platform port on the assabet. I have loaded the gdb stub to 0x10000.
>
> How do you get the GDB stubs into memory at 0x10000?

I compile the stub by doing:
ecosconfig new trizeps stubs
ecosconfig tree
make

the 0x10000 is hardcoded into the memory map...

Then I run this application from Keith & Koep to append a header to the 
gdb_module.img, and the new file is sent over ethernet (bootp) onto the eval 
board using the K&K bootstrap loader. Nothing too complicated there...

I can build the libtarget.a from "ecosconfig new trizeps" just fine, and all 
the examples in [...]/examples/ run just fine through gdb (or, well.. 
Insight)..


> > When I try to download the tm_basic file using insight, I get the
> > following on the console:
> >
> > Loading section .rom_vectors, size 0x40 lma 0x20000
> > Loading section .text, size 0xc7b8 lma 0x20040
> > Loading section .rodata, size 0xe6c lma 0x2c7f8
> > Loading section .data, size 0xae4 lma 0x2d664
> > Start address 0x20040, load size 57672
> > Transfer rate: 27139 bits/sec, 303 bytes/write.
>
> Did you give some other command here?

No. This is the what I get when I open the tm_basic file using the menus in 
insight and press the "Run" button.. Note that all the other kernel tests 
work just fine with this method...

> > 0x0001162c in ?? ()
>
> My guess is that this address (0x20000) overlaps with your GDB stubs.

It shouldn't.. Here's the objdump -h of the stub:
# arm-elf-objdump -h gdb_module.img

gdb_module.img:     file format elf32-littlearm

Sections:
Idx Name          Size      VMA       LMA       File off  Algn
  0 .debug_aranges 00000c60  00000000  00000000  000104bc  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
  1 .debug_pubnames 00001686  00000000  00000000  0001111c  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
  2 .debug_info   000186a2  00000000  00000000  000127a2  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
  3 .debug_abbrev 00002515  00000000  00000000  0002ae44  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
  4 .debug_line   0000ad46  00000000  00000000  0002d359  2**0
                  CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
  5 .debug_frame  00002324  00000000  00000000  000380a0  2**2
                  CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING
  6 .rom_vectors  00000040  00010000  00010000  00008000  2**0
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
  7 .text         00007d30  00010040  00010040  00008040  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
  8 .fini         00000000  00017d70  00017d70  0003a3c4  2**0
                  CONTENTS
  9 .rodata       0000026c  00017d70  00017d70  0000fd70  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
 10 .rodata1      00000000  00017fdc  00017fdc  0003a3c4  2**0
                  CONTENTS
 11 .fixup        00000000  00017fdc  00017fdc  0003a3c4  2**0
                  CONTENTS
 12 .gcc_except_table 00000000  00017fdc  00017fdc  0003a3c4  2**0
                  CONTENTS
 13 .fixed_vectors 00000160  00000020  00000020  0003a3e0  2**5
                  CONTENTS, READONLY
 14 .data         000004bc  00080000  00017fdc  00010000  2**2
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
 15 .bss          00010a98  000804bc  000804bc  000104bc  2**4
                  ALLOC

There should be plenty of space at 0x20000...


> * just a query: Have you considered running RedBoot on your board?

Well.. I tried it very briefly, and it seemed to work just fine.. But it's 
very close in functionality to the K&K bootstrap loader, so I really didn't 
see the point... Also, I don't have the ethernet connector functioning at 
this point, so I'd still be locked to the rs232 port..

  -- Christer

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]