This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?

From: Mark Salter <msalter at redhat dot com>
To: grante at visi dot com
Cc: gary at chez-thomas dot org, ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:36:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [ECOS] TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?
References: <20020708181640.A31952@visi.com> <1026170335.15020.1426.camel@hermes.chez-thomas.org> <20020708183316.A31984@visi.com>

>>>>> Grant Edwards writes:

> I've been browsing around the sources and haven't quite figured
> out how it's supposed to work.  I do have the TCP_NODELAY flag
> set on the socket, but I don't know if that has anything to do
> with it.  That is easy enough to test.

Try turning it off. TCP_NODELAY tells the stack to send ACKs without
waiting a bit for a possible packet to piggyback on.

--Mark

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?
  - From: Grant Edwards

References:
- TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?
  - From: Grant Edwards
- Re: TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?
  - From: Gary Thomas
- Re: TCP stack not delaying/piggybacking ACKs?
  - From: Grant Edwards

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]