This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: _flash_xxx() in flash_am29xxxxx.inl

Hi,

> The routines
> you want to patch don't actually touch the FLASH space (except via
> the call to the _XXX routine that does the work), so they can reside
> anywhere. 

I think _XXX routine actually touches the FLASH space 
and it is the very one which I want to patch. 
I suspect that you might mistake XXX for _XXX.
In my opinion,

    1) XXX can be anywhere.
    2) _XXX and should be in ram.

Correct?

> The question about overwriting the FLASH space must be managed outside
> these routines, e.g. by the RedBoot FLASH framework.

I get it.

Thanks,
Motoya Kurotsu
Allied Telesis K.K.



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]