This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: _flash_xxx() in flash_am29xxxxx.inl

On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 20:25, Motoya Kurotsu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > The routines
> > you want to patch don't actually touch the FLASH space (except via
> > the call to the _XXX routine that does the work), so they can reside
> > anywhere. 
> 
> I think _XXX routine actually touches the FLASH space 
> and it is the very one which I want to patch. 
> I suspect that you might mistake XXX for _XXX.
> In my opinion,
> 
>     1) XXX can be anywhere.
>     2) _XXX and should be in ram.
> 
> Correct?

Yes, I think so.  It looks like we've just been lucky in the past
with these routines working as they are.  I'll apply your patch.



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]