This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: shared object of CDL.
At Fri, 9 Aug 2002 10:27:37 +0100 (BST),
Bart Veer wrote:
> Is there a specific reason why you want libcdl to become a shared
> object? If not, my preference would be to keep it as a simple static
> library for now, in the interest of portability.
Hmm, I forgot that the CDL library is GPL, not LGPL. If people use libcdl.a
for their program, then these program must be licenced under GPL.
I have a question. If a program use a CDL plugin which dynamically links
libcdl, then do the program have to be licenced under GPL?
--
Debian Project http://debian.org/ - Masato Taruishi <taru@debian.org>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss