This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: how to add pxa250 to ecos?
- From: Mark Salter <msalter at redhat dot com>
- To: h dot schurig at mn-logistik dot de
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 07:26:42 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] how to add pxa250 to ecos?
- References: <200208200900.01662.h.schurig@mn-logistik.de>
>>>>> Holger Schurig writes:
> If I understand the other directories in packages/hal/arm correctly, then some
> (e.g. arm9, sa11x0) have a ./var directory that contains processor-generic
> stuff. The other subdirs then contain board-specific stuff.
> In the current ecos CVS there is in packages/hal/arm a directory xscale.
> In this directory there is no ./var directory. So I thing that "verde"
> (whatever this is) and iq80321 are both boards.
Verde is the 80321 CPU (early Intel docs referred to it as Verde). IQ80321 is
the eval board which uses the verde CPU.
>> From what I've seen in their sourcecodes, both things are quite different from
> an PXA250, e.g. they seem to have PCI related hardware.
> Therefore the question to the gurus: would the following structure
> packages/hal/arm/pxa/ver - with PXA processor related stuff
> packages/hal/arm/pxa/idp - for the Accelent IDP board
> packages/hal/arm/pxa/ramses - for our board
> be ok?
I would prefer something like:
packages/hal/arm/xscale/pxa250 - with PXA processor related stuff
or
packages/hal/arm/xscale/cotulla
packages/hal/arm/xscale/idp
packages/hal/arm/xscale/ramses
--Mark
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss