This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Problem with IP Stack ...
Andrew Lunn wrote:
>
> > It is also strange that, although the (indicated) MBUFs increase
> > from 0 to 72, the (indicated) pool memory does not decrease ???
>
> ? I don't follow. Take this as an example...
>
> > Network stack mbuf stats:
> > mbufs 75, clusters 63, free clusters 24
> > Failed to get 0 times
> > Waited to get 0 times
> > Drained queues to get 331 times
> > Misc mpool: total 65520, free 62400, max free block 61780
> > Mbufs pool: total 65408, free 55680, blocksize 128
> > Clust pool: total 131072, free 0, blocksize 2048
>
> (65408 - 55680) / 128 = 76.
Yes, I had the order of messages somehow messed up in the attachment of my last
mail. Seems to be Ok as it is!
> You have still not told us your platform, ethernet device, or which
> stack. It makes is much harder for us to go looking for 36 in the
> code.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-09/msg00076.html
Tom
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss