This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Problem with IP Stack ...


Andrew Lunn wrote:
> 
> > It is also strange that, although the (indicated) MBUFs increase
> > from 0 to 72, the (indicated) pool memory does not decrease ???
> 
> ? I don't follow. Take this as an example...
> 
> > Network stack mbuf stats:
> >    mbufs 75, clusters 63, free clusters 24
> >    Failed to get 0 times
> >    Waited to get 0 times
> >    Drained queues to get 331 times
> > Misc mpool: total   65520, free   62400, max free block 61780
> > Mbufs pool: total   65408, free   55680, blocksize  128
> > Clust pool: total  131072, free       0, blocksize 2048
> 
> (65408 - 55680) / 128 = 76.

Yes, I had the order of messages somehow messed up in the attachment of my last
mail. Seems to be Ok as it is!

> You have still not told us your platform, ethernet device, or which
> stack. It makes is much harder for us to go looking for 36 in the
> code.

	http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2002-09/msg00076.html

Tom

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]