RE: [ECOS] Who's maintaining CVS

["James" <james at rdx dot com>]

Alas,
This is the problem.  And no blame on the eCos folks, who
were laid off like a lot of us :(
I've been waiting for these patches to be harmonized for months,
unfortunately without results. 
I've inquired to ecoscentric for help.  No response.
It's this lack of activity that makes me question
the fine Computer Science represented by eCos.
James


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Drury [mailto:tdrury@siliconmotorsports.com] 
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:02 PM
> To: eCos Discussion
> Cc: jani@iv.ro; Thomas.Koeller@baslerweb.com; Gary Thomas
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] Who's maintaining CVS
> 
> 
> Gary Thomas wrote:
> > On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 13:02, Tim Drury wrote:
> > 
> >>I would like to add to this: Will the AT91 HAL patches
> >>that Thomas and I wrote make it back into CVS?  Those were
> >>submitted a couple months ago and I'd really like to sync
> >>my local tree back to the main cvs tree.  I would volunteer
> >>to do this, but you really don't want me mucking around
> >>with cvs too much.
> > 
> > 
> > Those were fairly significant patches.  Have the contributors
> > (you and Thomas?) provided copyright assignments for the work?
> > 
> 
> Okay, good point.  I'm getting signatures now.
> 
> Jani and Thomas: have you guys already submitted this paperwork
> to Redhat?  Jani, if you recall I used your Atmel at49xxxx flash
> device driver that you emailed me when I submitted the patch and
> you name is all over the credits for it.
> 
> -tim
> 
> 


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss