This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Qiang Huang wrote:
No, you don't have to use Red Hat's GNUPro tools - you can use the free GNU tools.the one for altera excalibur. thanks. (If I want to use the ecos, must I always use the GNUPro tools set?
eCos is dependent on GNU tools yes (of which GNUPro is a variant). Being compiler independent makes porting much more difficult (each compiler's assembler is different) and reduces functionality (e.g. other compiler's do not support important things like ordering of global C++ constructors).the ecos is always compiler dependent. not like the RTOS: uCOS? so what's the advantage of using ecos as a compiler dependent RTOS? Thanks a lot.)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |