This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Fabrice Gautier wrote:
Not with the MPL. If you change something, then someone might be entitled to those changes, but that someone isn't necessarily
you :-).
Gah? If _I_ change something _I_ may not be entitled to those changes ?
>
Aargh. I've just looked it up and this is one of the areas the MPL and RHEPL differ - I had thought they were more alike than that. Sigh - we've been talking at cross purposes a little. My bad, sorry.My point was that if I receive a binary, I'm entitled to the eCos source code that is inside the binary no matter what license the binary falls under (I believe MPL section 3.2 says that). One things that differ may be the means you get the source. When I get that source code I get it in one of the 3 options, as the distributor choose.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |