This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Raphaël Cotty wrote:
You need HAL changes regardless - various things need to be set up correctly in the first place. It's not to do with the kernel itself.En réponse à Jonathan Larmour <jifl@eCosCentric.com>:Raphaël Cotty wrote:Hi, Is it possible to use exception and/or RTTI in C++ application code?Not in the current sources, although I have patches to do so - I'veAnd if it is, what are the drawbacks ?
never checked them in yet though as it requires changes to each and every
target.
Ok, but why not ? What is the link between the kernel and exception and/or RTTI ? Why is it not possible to compile the kernel whithout such options and some parts of the application with ?
I'm sure. Unfortunately there are quite a list of things I need to do first. This may not make it for 2.0.In my case I have a set of constructors which can fail with different reasons and I need to known them. I would feel the use of exception very convenient in that case.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |