Re: [ECOS] Question CYGNUM_KERNEL_THREADS_DATA_MAX?

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>]

Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> Patrick Doyle wrote:
> > Wandering in here very late in the game, I am wondering why you don't 
> > just
> > mask the result of the shift with 0xFFFFFFFFu whereever you use it.  On
> > 32-bit machines, the optimizer will (presumably) ignore the NOP mask, 
> > and on
> > other machines, the result will be 0 as you desire.
>
> Well that's true,
Except it isn't actually where we're shifting left by 32 of course. Still, 
my alternative avoids any possible portability problems.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric       http://www.eCosCentric.com/       <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss