This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: RE: AT91 patches
- From: "Koeller, T." <Thomas dot Koeller at baslerweb dot com>
- To: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:35:38 +0100
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches
Yes, of course, those two things are totally unrelated.
Thomas
-----------------------------------------------
Thomas Koeller, Software Development
Basler Vision Technologies
An der Strusbek 60-62
22926 Ahrensburg
Germany
Tel +49 (4102) 463-390
Fax +49 (4102) 463-46390
mailto:Thomas.Koeller@baslerweb.com
http://www.baslerweb.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jani Monoses [mailto:jani@iv.ro]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:24 PM
> To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches
>
>
> Jifl, Thomas
> can't the AT91 patch be merged without the flash changes initially?
> The existing EB40 is not using it's first half of the flash anyway
> being reserved for angel.
> So IMHO ther would be a more logical layout for other AT91 variants to
> be worked on and no regression introduced since the EB40
> flash is not multiple sector
> aware AFAIK.
>
> Jani.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss