This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Re: casts to a type other than an integral or enumerationtype in a constant-expression


Jonathan Larmour wrote:

Indeed it's like that. But the whole thing is cast to an int, so the expression as a whole has integral type. From the C++ standard 6.4.2 para 2 that's all that's required, the way I read it. Having a non-integral type in an intermediate stage should make no difference.
you are incorrect. [5.19] says quite clearly what an integral constant
expression can involve. A cast to a function pointer is not one of them.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
         The voices in my head said this was stupid too
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org



--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]