This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: jffs2 / eCos
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead dot org>
- To: Bob Koninckx <bob dot koninckx at mech dot kuleuven dot ac dot be>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com, linux-mtd at lists dot infradead dot org
- Date: 02 Apr 2003 09:20:04 +0100
- Subject: [ECOS] Re: jffs2 / eCos
- Organization:
- References: <1049057380.1180.36.camel@pc-002> <1049095079.16365.768.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <1049142569.1913.11.camel@pc-002> <1049150862.16365.793.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk> <1049269724.25405.8.camel@pc086-2.mech.kuleuven.ac.be>
On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 08:48, Bob Koninckx wrote:
> > We should just fix jffs2_read_inode_range() to handle reads which don't
> > start at the beginning of a node. It's not hard.
>
> I removed the above mentioned check and now it _appears_ to work
> correctly. Is this all that needs to be done ?
Can you show me the patch or resulting code?
> Are there similar issues when writing to the filesys ?
No, writing should be fine -- but you really do want to try to ensure
that you don't get writes split up into 256-byte chunks, since that'll
waste space on the file system (till it gets GC'd and merged).
--
dwmw2
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss