This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libc-time-clock test doesn't seem to be written correctly??


Brij Bihari Pandey wrote:
Hi Jonathan,


test FAIL messages. Possibly I would have - how could there be problem with

the


test, wouldn't anyone on list have mentioned it earlier, if it was so?

Not necessarily I suppose. But there would probably have been something in the wide variety of hardware that used to exist in the Red Hat test farm.


You mean eCos people at RedHat were aware of this problem?

I was one of the eCos people at Red Hat. And I didn't know about the problem. Now there's just one (and he sometimes denies being an eCos team person either because he wasn't when the team was canned, but I don't agree).


I am attaching the "cvs diff -u5 -p" output for the clock.c file along with
this mail for your reviewing.

That's fine. I've checked it in (with some trivial changes in comments).


Thanks for that!

Jifl
--
eCosCentric    http://www.eCosCentric.com/    The eCos and RedBoot experts
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


-- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]