This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Recommended gcc version for 1.0?


On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:10:42PM -0400, Mark Salter wrote:

> > Is there a recommended arm-elf toolchain version for eCos 2.0?
> > I tried using the eCos-centric toolchain installed by the eCos
> > installer, but it's little-endian only, and my HW is big-endian.
> 
> > :(
> 
> > I _think_ all that's missing is a big-endian libgcc.a...
> 
> You could build a toolchain from sources. 
> 
>   http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/build-toolchain.html
> 
> has insns to build a little-endian toolchain. I have a small patch
> that I've used in the past to build a bi-endian toolchain although
> I haven't updated the docs on this page.
> 
> Apply http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/gcc-3.2.1-arm-be.patch to
> gcc after applying the gcc-3.2.1-arm-multilib.patch and you'll
> wind up with a bi-endian toolchain.

Thanks -- build is in progress.  

When did big-endian ARM gcc users become second-class citizens?
I swear that for 2.95, doing a "confgure --target=arm-elf" used
to work just fine.

-- 
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]