This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: hybrid kernel
- From: "David Marqvar (DAM)" <DAM at tt dot dk>
- To: Satish Kumar <satish at bvt dot sc dot sanyo dot co dot jp>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:26:25 +0200
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] hybrid kernel
Why not use RTAI - an realtime extension to Linux?
- it's created to do just what you want...
/David Marqvar
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@eCosCentric.com]
Sent: 3. september 2003 05:14
To: Satish Kumar
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] hybrid kernel
Satish Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I m interested in implementing this hybrid kernel were i have
> the eCos/uITRON as my real time kernel, which supports a secondary
> kernel (i.e embedded linux). this architecture has some drivers
> implemented using the embedded linux kernel and some using the real time
> kernel.
That has not yet ever been done with eCos, and I would be surprised if it
has been done with uITRON. So be careful what you are letting yourself in
for.
> now, my concern here is regarding the choice of my real time
> kernel, which i am not able to decide..i.e wheather to choose uITRON or
> eCos..coz i m only aware of eCos RTOS, and know nothing about the uITRON
> RTOS. i believe that the footprint of eCos is much less compared to
> the uITRON, but how about their performance comparision..how do i go
> about find their performace, to decide on my real time kernel.
Write tests to do the same thing in both of course.
Jifl
--
eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts
--["No sense being pessimistic, it wouldn't work anyway"]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss