This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
- From: "mayasky" <b8944004 at stmail dot cgu dot edu dot tw>
- To: "Gary Thomas" <gary at mlbassoc dot com>
- Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:48:16 +0800
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
- References: <20031008061017.M70557@stmail.cgu.edu.tw> <1065606994.1884.592.camel@hermes>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Thomas" <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: "b8944004" <b8944004@stmail.cgu.edu.tw>
Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOS] What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and
"COMPAQ"?
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 00:15, b8944004 wrote:
> > What is different between the satrtup mode "RAM" and "COMPAQ"?
> > My platform is IPAQ.
> >
>
> COMPAQ mode assumes that the hardware memory map was left as the
> COMPAQ boot loader sets things up.
COMPAQ boot loader ?
Could you tell me a example? Angel??or???
> RAM mode assumes that RedBoot
> has already remapped memory to match the eCos model.
>
> --
> Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
> MLB Associates
>
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss