This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: fis free command
- From: "Gary Thomas" <gary at mlbassoc dot com>
- To: "Chris Garry" <cgarry at sweeneydesign dot co dot uk>
- Cc: "eCos Discussion" <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 00:56:12 -0700 (MST)
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] fis free command
- References: <003c01c39fdc$bc7631f0$500ba8c0@jasper>
Chris Garry said:
> I just re-built RedBoot and noticed a small problem with the fis free
> command. Output from RedBoot below:
>
> -- Begin --
> RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROM]
> Non-certified release, version E7T-DBoard - built 16:51:24, Oct 31 2003
>
> Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, Red Hat, Inc.
>
> RAM: 0x00000000-0x00080000, [0x00017cc8-0x0006f000] available
> 0x01900000-0x03900000, [0x01900000-0x03900000] available
> FLASH: 0x01800000 - 0x01880000, 128 blocks of 0x00001000 bytes each.
> RedBoot> fis free
> 0x0183B000 .. 0x0187E000
> 0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF
> RedBoot>
> -- End --
>
> The last line of output from the fis free command
> (0x01880000 .. 0x0187FFFF) is bogus since the highest FLASH address
> is 0x0187FFFF.
>
> Has this been seen on other platforms?
No. What does 'fis list' show?
Note: 'fis free' has recently been changed to believe the values in
the fis directory. If it is incorrect, then all bets are off. A
configuration control can be used to restore the previous [dubious]
behaviour.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss