This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: eCos developpement process?
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:
> Big patches take more work and so tend to take longer. Ugly patches
> generally either get rejected and requested to be re-written, or we
> fix them ourselves. Some patches get stuck for legal reasons. Some
> patches get included fast because it interests a particular
> maintainers. Some patches get delayed because no maintainer is
> particularly interested in the patch.
It's almost completely slipped my mind at this point, because I
haven't touched eCos since then, but which combination of these
factors best describe the floppy driver that I had posted?
Thankyou,
--
David N. Welton
Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/
Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/
Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/
Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss