This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Help with linux synthetic target, please.
- From: Gordon Scott <g dot ecos dot a at gscott dot co dot uk>
- To: <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:22:45 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Help with linux synthetic target, please.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:40:16 +0000 (GMT)
> Bart Veer <bartv@ecoscentric.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Gordon" == Gordon Scott <g.ecos.a@gscott.co.uk> writes:
> >
> > Gordon> Is this all new problem stuff with gcc 3.3.x(?) or am I
> > Gordon> going over old ground here? What else need I do to get
> > Gordon> this synth version up and running, please?
> >
> > These are new problems with gcc 3.3.x. The code currently in anoncvs,
> > i.e. including the patches I sent you earlier for __GNUC__ >= 3, is
> > known to work with 3.2.2 because that is the compiler I currently have
> > installed.
>
> FWIW, linux synthetic compiles/works here with gcc 3.3.3 and binutils
> 2.14.90.0.7 with ecos from CVS
Well, I have gcc 3.3.3 and a binutils 2.14 -- don't know about the rest
of the number up and running.
I've successfully compiled everything except that pesly cxxsupp.cxx,
which still quits with: undefined reference to `operator new(unsigned)',
so I've just commented cxxsupp.cxx out of the makefile for now.
Flagging a warning of this to others as a possible problem might be
good.
Now let's see if I can use it ;-)
Thanks for your help.
ATB,
Gordon.
--
Gordon Scott http://www.gscott.co.uk
Linux ... Because I like to *get* there today.
Hey, I'm looking for a new job! See -> http://www.gscott.co.uk
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss