Re: [ECOS] AT91 bad IRQ/FIQ priority handling?

[Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>]

On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 05:00:57PM +0200, Andrea Michelotti wrote:
> The code I added is related only to the FIQ interrupt source generally
> linked to the line 0 of the AIC (atmel Advanced Interrupt Controller) .
> In fact if the FIQ line is linked to another line (possible, but, as far as
> I know,  in atmel AIC fiq line is for default to 0) this code is not correct
> but should be modified introducing a constant that identify the FIQ line.
> Does hal_platform_ints.h have a macro to identify FIQ interrupt sources?
> If not, I propose to add one to handle this kind of situations in at91
> targets.
> what do you think?

That sounds like a better solution. But since this is in the hal
varient directory you need to check if this is correct for all
platforms that use the varient, ie eb40, eb40a, eb52 and eb55. If this
is not generally true you will need to add some CDL so that this
feature is only enabled on platforms that support it.

        Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss