This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: AT91 bad IRQ/FIQ priority handling?


On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 06:43:18PM +0200, Andrea Michelotti wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> I did the check: all at91 targets have an AIC line 0 dedicated to FIQ (in
> these platforms FIQ is an external interrupt ).
> Then I think we don't need a CDL entry, a constant should be enough, but I
> don't know the appropriate header where to put a constant like
> CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_FIQ 0 for all at91 targets.

Zero is probably not the correct value, it needs to fit in with the
other constants. The files you need to change are:

hal/arm/at91/eb40/current/include/hal_platform_ints.h
hal/arm/at91/eb40a/current/include/hal_platform_ints.h
hal/arm/at91/eb42/current/include/hal_platform_ints.h
hal/arm/at91/eb55/current/include/hal_platform_ints.h

        Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]