Re: [ECOS] Why to signal condvar with mutex held?

[Sergei Organov <osv at topconrd dot ru>]

Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> writes:

> On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 07:53:57PM +0300, Sergei Organov wrote:
> > sandeep <shimple0@yahoo.com> writes:
> > > > > what about keeping the waitlists sorted in decreasing priority order of
> > > > > threads, when you go with idea of wait morphing? won't this ensure that
> > > > > highest priority waiting thread gets the mutex?
> > > > 
> > > > As far as I know, priority (as opposed to FIFO) wait queues is a
> > > > separate configuration option in eCos, so you can have them even now if
> > > yup. there is CYGIMP_KERNEL_SCHED_SORTED_QUEUES in scheduler.cdl that
> > > is disabled by default (not much varied configuration from default, i
> > > have explored, as controlled by needs), but the description of that is
> > > slightly off.
> > 
> > It's broken and I've already reported this, see:
> > 
> > <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2004-11/msg00372.html>
> 
> How about submitting a patch which corrects this?

OK, will do. I've posted that in a hope to get some response in case
I've missed or misunderstood something, but got nothing :(

-- 
Sergei.


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss