This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
eCos With GCC 3.4.3
- From: Jay Foster <jay at systech dot com>
- To: "'ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org'" <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:22:32 -0800
- Subject: [ECOS] eCos With GCC 3.4.3
I am attempting to migrate from GCC 3.2.1 to GCC 3.4.3, and have
a few questions. I updated my pkgconf/rules.mak file to
bring in the added support for newer GCC versions. However, I
get many compiler warnings, such as:
cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wstrict-prototypes" is valid for
C/ObjC but not for C++
Should an additional CFLAGS "filter" be added to the rules.mak file
for the ACTUAL_CXXFLAGS, like the following?
Index: ecos/packages/pkgconf/rules.mak
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvsroot/ecos_root/public/packages/pkgconf/rules.mak,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -5 -p -r1.2 rules.mak
--- ecos/packages/pkgconf/rules.mak 25 Feb 2005 18:38:27 -0000 1.2
+++ ecos/packages/pkgconf/rules.mak 25 Feb 2005 18:40:32 -0000
@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ ACTUAL_CFLAGS = $(CFLAGS)
ACTUAL_CFLAGS := $(subst -fno-rtti,,$(ACTUAL_CFLAGS))
ACTUAL_CFLAGS := $(subst -frtti,,$(ACTUAL_CFLAGS))
ACTUAL_CFLAGS := $(subst -Woverloaded-virtual,,$(ACTUAL_CFLAGS))
ACTUAL_CFLAGS := $(subst -fvtable-gc,,$(ACTUAL_CFLAGS))
-ACTUAL_CXXFLAGS = $(CFLAGS)
+ACTUAL_CXXFLAGS = $(subst -Wstrict-prototypes,,$(CFLAGS))
# pattern matching rules to generate a library object from source code
# object filenames are prefixed to avoid name clashes
# a single dependency rule is generated (file extension = ".o.d")
%.o.d : %.c
This change effectively silences most of these warnings. There are a few
places that aren't using the rules.mak file that still get the warnings.
I also get several warnings like the following:
time.inl:157: warning: inlining failed in call to
'cyg_libc_time_year_is_leap': --param inline-unit-growth limit reached
Is this related to the added '-finline-limit-7000' option in rules.mak?
Should it be larger than 7000? Is this something else entirely? Does
it matter? The code seems to compile and work properly.
I can submit a proper patch for rules.mak if this is deemed the right thing
to do. I just wanted to see if anyone else has already been down this road.
Jay Foster
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss