This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: : Is eCos Hard Real Time OS ??


Hello. Vamshi.

 I'm a one of user in japan.

in <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506241710050.5855@mars.cse.iitb.ac.in>
   "Re: [ECOS]: Is eCos Hard Real Time OS ??"
   "R Vamshi Krishna <vamshi@cse.iitb.ac.in>" wrote

> Then what parts do I re-write to make it hard-real time ?
> Because I want to use eCos but also I need a hard reak-time
> OS.

 Choose eCos is better idea, and fast enough for realtime application.

 I don't know how hard real-time you need in your system.
Where or what is a border about hard vs soft real-time.

 In my experience, someone force very hard response to OS, it's a bad design
about elements (threads, messaging, mutex..) or whole system. In such system,
may crash cause critical design.

 Let's try to use current eCos, just as it is.

// Kozo Kakehi from Osaka
// kakehi@kme.co.jp

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]