This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re: Dual Ethernet Cards of Intel i82559 for Intel IXDP465 platform

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
To: clemens fischer <ino-qc at spotteswoode dot dnsalias dot org>
Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:01:51 +0100
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: Dual Ethernet Cards of Intel i82559 for Intel IXDP465 platform
References: <C66EAB9D6248A24E8021779A4854544188C154@taipei03.ADVANTECH.CORP> <slrndr0aiu.2u0.ino-qc@spotteswoode.dnsalias.org>

On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 06:37:34PM +0100, clemens fischer wrote:
> Robin.Lin in <C66EAB9D6248A24E8021779A4854544188C154@taipei03.ADVANTECH.CORP>:
> 
> >  When I enable two Ethernet cards support of Intel i82559 for Intel
> >  IXDP465 platform, I get some problems.
> 
> >  If I set the both IP address in the same domain, such as 192.168.0.1
> >  and 192.168.0.2, subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 and default gateway is
> >  192.168.0.254.
> 
> >  It seems work fine. But actually, when I ping the first Ethernet
> >  card, I get reply packet from the first Ethernet card. And then I
> >  ping the second Ethernet card, I ALSO get reply packet from the first
> >  Ethernet card.

This is correct behaviour. If it did anything else, it would be
broken.  Why do you think it should do something different?

        Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- Dual Ethernet Cards of Intel i82559 for Intel IXDP465 platform
  - From: Robin.Lin
- Re: Dual Ethernet Cards of Intel i82559 for Intel IXDP465 platform
  - From: clemens fischer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]