This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: how to measure time from within flash_program_buf
- From: David Vrabel <dvrabel at arcom dot com>
- To: "Neundorf, Alexander" <Alexander dot Neundorf at jenoptik dot com>
- Cc: ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:05:25 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] how to measure time from within flash_program_buf
- References: <5A8A17126B73AC4C83968F6C4505E3C504315E0F@JO-EX01.JENOPTIK.NET>
Neundorf, Alexander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in the Intel 28fxxx flash driver there is a timeout used, and this
> timeout is specified as a simple loop which is executed 5000000
> times. Now we have a fast processor and a slow flash, so for us this
> timeout isn't big enough. We could simply increase the count, but
> this still depends on flash and processor speed.
I'd have suggested putting HAL_DELAY_US() macro calls in the loop. That
would give you a lower bound on the timeout. However, I think it it has
the same problem as HAL_CLOCK_READ() below.
How about sticking a few more functions (like hal_delay_us) in .2ram ?
> Ideally we'd like to use HAL_CLOCK_READ() to measure the time, but
> this isn't possible since hal_clock_read() is located in the section
> .text which is in the flash, but flash_program_buf() is located in
> the section .data which is located in RAM. When calling
> hal_clock_read() the linker complains and more importantly it won't
> work since the flash is busy while it is being programmed.
David Vrabel
--
David Vrabel, Design Engineer
Arcom, Clifton Road Tel: +44 (0)1223 411200 ext. 3233
Cambridge CB1 7EA, UK Web: http://www.arcom.com/
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss