This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
AW: Some findings with multiple eCos repositories in ECOS_REPOSITORY
- From: "Neundorf, Alexander" <Alexander dot Neundorf at jenoptik dot com>
- To: <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:03:31 +0200
- Subject: AW: [ECOS] Some findings with multiple eCos repositories in ECOS_REPOSITORY
> Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
> [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org]Im Auftrag von Øyvind
> Harboe
...
> - I believe there exists HALs that could be open source, while it does
> not make sense that they are maintained by the eCos maintainers.
> Multiple eCos repositories allows this easily and cleanly.
>
> - I don't see a problem with generated HALs using multiple
> eCos repositories.
>
> Most excellent feature! Much too well hidden!
Exactly !
Only problem: configtool doesn't support it (yet).
Maybe the one who did the porting to autotools could give it a try ?
(I really don't have the time to do it)
Bye
Alex
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss