This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: openssl port status
- From: "Chris Zimman" <czimman at bloomberg dot com>
- To: "Tim Hatton" <tim at coherent-tech dot co dot uk>, <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:58:26 +0100
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] openssl port status
Tim,
No, it's not required at all. Compile with -DNO_IDEA and it's gone.
--Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
[mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hatton
Sent: 12 October 2006 12:57
To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: [ECOS] openssl port status
Hi,
I just wanted to check what the status of the ecos port of openssl at
ftp://ftp.ecoscentric.com/pub/contrib/openssl-1.9.6b.epk is.
Is this the latest version around (it seems to be reasonably old, but
they
may not be a bad thing).
Should I be looking anywhere else for a later version?
Also, a specific question about the port: is there any reason why the
IDEA
encryption algorithm (which is patented) is required in order to enable
the
SSL API? Without SSL API I can't do anything, which sort of implies that
I
have to enable IDEA, but I don't want to use patented algorithms. Have I
misunderstood something fundamental here?
Best regards,
Tim
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/openssl-port-status-tf2429856.html#a6774824
Sent from the Sourceware - ecos-discuss mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss