This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: eCos on Windows without Cygwin
- From: Mikael Helbo Kjær <mhk at io-connect dot com>
- To: <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:40:52 +0100
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] eCos on Windows without Cygwin
Øyvind Harboe wrote
> As far as I know, MinGW binaries of GCC toolchains + eCos tools is the
> most tantalizing prospect.
>
> Since a eCos needs are so simple & unchanging, I believe a MinGW based
> package could live relatively unchanged for years.
>
> Does anyone know of any organized efforts to address these problems?
>
I haven't seen anything working off MinGW or MSYS. It would be a useful
thing to have around. The general feeling I have from developers using
cygwin or MinGW toolchains is however a general feeling of slowness.
Instead I have heard of developers running their eCos development
environment in a virtual machine and having different vm-images for
different situations or even development targets. Unfortunately there is no
standard for VM-images either so any VM distribution would currently be tied
to a specific product. From my own experience a VMed environment is in fact
faster than a cygwin based one. I have no idea about MinGW though.
Best regards,
Mikael H. Kjaer
IO-Connect
http://www.io-connect.com
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss