This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: A problem about constructor sequence

From: Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
Cc: taiyun at sunnorth dot com dot cn, ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:54:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [ECOS] A problem about constructor sequence
References: <OFAE4F14C8.27D51BC9-ON48257352.0032BD6A-48257352.0032BD79@sunnorth.com.cn> <20070910093526.GB20127@lunn.ch>

Andrew Lunn wrote:


static cyg_libc_startup_dummy_constructor_class cyg_libc_startup_obj
                                   CYGBLD_ATTRIB_INIT_AFTER(CYG_INIT_LIBC)

I don't see how this can break anything. The scheduler is disabled at
this point anyway. The the resume call just marks the thread as
runable, but it won't get run until a lot later.

Jifl: Is this O.K?

I think this is absolutely fine.

Jifl
--
eCosCentric Limited      http://www.eCosCentric.com/     The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK.       Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["The best things in life aren't things."]------      Opinions==mine

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

References:
- A problem about constructor sequence
  - From: taiyun
- Re: A problem about constructor sequence
  - From: Andrew Lunn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]