This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow?

From: Alexandre <thekyz at gmail dot com>
To: Alexandre <thekyz at gmail dot com>, "eCos Mailing List" <ecos-discuss at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:47:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow?
References: <d5aafeec0807030257i26ba319dpe2169e35b6c0f5ff@mail.gmail.com> <20080703101011.GC27831@lunn.ch>
Reply-to: thekyz at gmail dot com

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> LPC2106 is an ARM right?

It is indeed.

> First off, i would enable asserts in the INFRA package. It adds some
> CPU overheads, but that might actually help in your situation....

My software does not start anymore when I do that. Do I have to add
something ? I read on the documentation that the execution of code can
be halted by asserts if a condition is not met. Is it the problem ?

Thanks,

Alex

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow?
  - From: Andrew Lunn

References:
- Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow?
  - From: Alexandre
- Re: Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow?
  - From: Andrew Lunn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]