This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Can excessive/intensive serial flow cause stack overflow?
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:06:48PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Alexandre <thekyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > TRACE: intr.cxx [ 86] Cyg_Interrupt::Cyg_Interrupt()
> > ((vector=7,
> > priority=4, data=40000860, isr=000049ec, dsr=00004a3c))
>
> Let's try to advance by myself :)
>
> CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART1 is interrupt 7 so there must be an error around this.
> Can't both UARTs use the same priority level & if not, how can I change that ?
Nope. Look at the code where the asserts are. Interrupts < 16 need to be unique.
However, i don't quite get this:
lunn@londo:~/eCos/anoncvs-clean/packages/hal/arm/lpc2xxx$ grep -r CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART *
var/current/src/hal_diag.c: CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART0,
var/current/src/hal_diag.c: CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART1,
var/current/include/hal_var_ints.h:#define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART0 6
var/current/include/hal_var_ints.h:#define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART1 7
So the default setup is they have different interrupt values.
Does your target override the values from the variant package?
Maybe there is something more subtle going on here.
Andrew
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss